"Global Climate Change" Fraud Might be Catalyst for Revolution/Civil War We know that the man-made global climate change is a fraud. Al Gore says so when he continues lying about the circumstances of the e-mail record. If he was confident that the real data supported his position he could throw these particular scientists under the bus but he can't. Like the crime boss whose molls have tape evidence of his crimes he has to provide for their defense.

Then the Canadians, in a move to guarantee their own destruction, have called for a world-wide one-child policy.

The "inconvenient truth" overhanging the UN's Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.

A planetary law, such as China's one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.

The world's other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity's soaring reproduction rate.

Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world's leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.

The intelligence behind this is the following:

-If only one child per female was born as of now, the world's population would drop from its current 6.5 billion to 5.5 billion by 2050, according to a study done for scientific academy Vienna Institute of Demography.

-By 2075, there would be 3.43 billion humans on the planet. This would have immediate positive effects on the world's forests, other species, the oceans, atmospheric quality and living standards.

Read more: http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2314438#ixzz0ZJHL72Su
The Financial Post is now on Facebook. Join our fan community today.

Well, they want a reduced population but will they reduce their families? I doubt it. Neither will most other cultural groups. As it is Europeans and those of European ancestral descent are already at or very close to zero population growth. If the current young adult generation knew that their grandchildren would be overcome by the non-complying Chinese (who have reversed their decades long limit to one child due to a lack of female children), Indians and Muslims, they likely wouldn't comply. Non-compliance IS revolution. Using physical force to enforce the prohibition is civil war. How violent these acts of resistance and enforcement become depends on the people involved.

As it is we kill to preserve our country now AND to enforce the law. Is it such a leap to think that we won't kill to defend our families generations from now or to enforce a population/breeding limit?

Labels: GlobalClimateChange

  ¶ posted by Hobie 1:00 PM