title>Lady Liberty Defended: November 2006
Lady Liberty Defended
Thursday, November 30, 2006
  No Surprise, the Dems Lie
The 9/11 Commission was the be-all end-all on the reasons that Bush's incompetence caused 9/11. However, Democrats Reject Key 9/11 Panel Suggestion as reported By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 30, 2006 demonstrates that they were doing nothing more than posturing. Add to that that Speaker-to-be Pelosi is allowing petty jealousy of Rep. Harman to keep that most qualified person from chairing the committee on intelligence and I think that says it all.

Here's the article for posterity...
It was a solemn pledge, repeated by Democratic leaders and candidates over and over: If elected to the majority in Congress, Democrats would implement all of the recommendations of the bipartisan commission that examined the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

But with control of Congress now secured, Democratic leaders have decided for now against implementing the one measure that would affect them most directly: a wholesale reorganization of Congress to improve oversight and funding of the nation's intelligence agencies. Instead, Democratic leaders may create a panel to look at the issue and produce recommendations, according to congressional aides and lawmakers.

Because plans for implementing the commission's recommendations are still fluid, Democratic officials would not speak for the record. But aides on the House and Senate appropriations, armed services and intelligence committees confirmed this week that a reorganization of Congress would not be part of the package of homeland-security changes up for passage in the "first 100 hours" of the Democratic Congress.

"I don't think that suggestion is going anywhere," said Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.), the chairman of the Appropriations defense subcommittee and a close ally of the incoming subcommittee chairman, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.). "That is not going to be their party position."

It may seem like a minor matter, but members of the commission say Congress's failure to change itself is anything but inconsequential. In 2004, the commission urged Congress to grant the House and Senate intelligence committees the power not only to oversee the nation's intelligence agencies but also to fund them and shape intelligence policy. The intelligence committees' gains would come at the expense of the armed services committees and the appropriations panels' defense subcommittees. Powerful lawmakers on those panels would have to give up prized legislative turf.

But the commission was unequivocal about the need.

"Of all our recommendations, strengthening congressional oversight may be among the most difficult and important," the panel wrote. "So long as oversight is governed by current congressional rules and resolutions, we believe the American people will not get the security they want and need."

Now Democrats are balking, just as Republicans did before them.

The decision will almost certainly anger commission members, as well as families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks, many of whom have pressed hard for implementation of the recommendations.

"The Democrats pledged to implement all the remaining 9/11 reforms, not some of them," said former representative Timothy J. Roemer (D-Ind.), who served on the commission.

Carie Lemack, whose mother was in one of the jets that hit the World Trade Center, echoed that sentiment: "It wasn't a Chinese takeout menu, the 41 recommendations. You have to do all of them."

Democratic leadership dust-ups this month severely limited the ability of House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) to implement the commission's recommendations, according to Democratic aides.

Pelosi strongly backed Murtha for House majority leader, only to see him soundly defeated by Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (Md.). That chain of events made it difficult for her to ask Murtha, a longtime ally, to relinquish control of the intelligence budget from his consolation prize, the chairmanship of the Appropriations defense subcommittee, according to Democratic sources.

Likewise, a controversy over the choice of a new chairman of the House intelligence committee proved to be a factor in the decision. The Sept. 11 commission urged Congress to do away with traditional term limits on the intelligence committees to preserve continuity and expertise, a recommendation the House implemented in 2003. But in her search for a reason to drop the committee's most senior Democrat, Jane Harman (Calif.), from the panel, Pelosi fell back on the tradition of term limits. She has decided to pass over the intelligence committee's second-ranking Democrat, Alcee L. Hastings (Fla.), as well.

To the Sept. 11 commission, the call for congressional overhaul was vital, said former New Jersey governor Thomas H. Kean (R), the commission's co-chairman. Because intelligence committee membership affords lawmakers access to classified information, only intelligence committee members can develop the expertise to watch over operations properly, he said. But because the panels do not control the budget, intelligence agencies tend to dismiss them.

"The person who controls your budget is the person you listen to," Kean said.

Those people, the appropriators, do not seem to care much, he said. The intelligence budget is a small fraction of the nearly $500 billion overseen by the armed services committees and the appropriations panels' defense subcommittees. Kean said that Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), an Armed Services Committee member, told the Sept. 11 commission that if his panel spends 10 minutes considering the intelligence budget, it has been a good year.

"We think this is extremely crucial," Kean said of a reorganization shifting budget authority to the intelligence committees. But, he added, there are "a lot of old bulls in both parties who just don't want to do it."

In 2004, the Senate tried to reach a compromise on the issue, proposing to create intelligence subcommittees under the House and Senate appropriations committees. The appropriators would maintain most of their power, but at least distinct panels would have to watch over intelligence spending.

The idea went nowhere in the House. To make it work, total spending on intelligence would have to be declassified, another commission recommendation that Congress has rejected. Besides, Young said, an intelligence subcommittee effectively exists in the form of the Appropriations defense subcommittee chairman and ranking member, who have taken serious interest in intelligence spending.

Democratic aides yesterday chose to talk up what they will do in the opening hours of the 110th Congress. Plans are not complete, but the incoming Democratic majority is likely to expand efforts to stop the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons; ensure the interoperability of communications equipment so first responders can communicate more effectively; develop a comprehensive screening system for air cargo; and establish a civil-liberties board to protect the public against intelligence agencies expanding their reach.
  Barrack Obama? For President of the USofA?
That's Barrack Hussein Obama. Man sans executive experience. Current flavor of the week, darling of the liberial socialist intelligenstia. No thank you. For President of the USofA? You have to be out of your everloving mind.

Oh sure the man is handsome (I'm told), youngish, and charming. But he's a lightweight in experience. He's a socialist. He's pro-Muslim and I suspect pro-radical Muslim.
Monday, November 27, 2006
  Charlie Rangel Agrees with Kerry
I expect better from a Korean war veteran. In fact that was the ONLY reason I respected Mr. Rangel. No more. This maroon has ignored the Army's own data that shows that education levels of all soldiers (not just the officers as in Charlie's time) are above and beyond the average. These peckerwoods need to look at the US Census figures.
Are Soldiers Black and Poor?
by Steve Sailer
UPI National Correspondent
From the Washington Politics & Policy Desk
Published 1/16/2003 12:19 PM

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 15 (UPI) -- Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., a Korean War veteran, has introduced a bill to reinstate the military draft, arguing, "A disproportionate number of the poor and members of minority groups make up the enlisted ranks of the [volunteer] military..."

Indeed, in a little noticed development, the percentage of military personnel who were minorities shot upward during the years from 1995 to 2000, with enlisted ranks rising from 28 percent to 38 percent minority (compared to 30 percent of the national population), and the officer corps growing from 11 percent to 19 percent.

The booming economy of the late 1990s may have made it harder for the Pentagon to recruit whites, who tend to enjoy more lucrative opportunities in the civilian economy than do blacks or Hispanics.

Blacks are found disproportionately in the military, while Hispanic residents, many of whom are not citizens, are slightly underrepresented. Blacks are found most heavily in the Army and are least common in the Air Force.

Contrary to popular belief, blacks have not died in combat in disproportionate numbers, even in Vietnam. Two leading military sociologists, Charles Moskos of Northwestern and John Sibley Butler of the University of Texas, researched this carefully for their 1996 book "All We Can Be: Black Leadership and Racial Integration the Army Way."

They reported, "Black fatalities amounted to 12.1 percent of all Americans killed in Southeast Asia -- a figure proportional to the number of blacks in the U.S. population at the time and slightly lower than the proportion of blacks in the Army at the close of the war."

(Moskos favors reinstituting the draft. He says Rangel's argument "persuasive" but that the most important reason is that the military is undermanned and relies too heavily on reserves.)

In recent decades, blacks have tended to gravitate away from combat jobs. In arguing against Rangel's bill, the Department of Defense noted, "Blacks today account for 21 percent of the enlisted force, but make up only 15 percent of combat arms (e.g., infantry, armor, artillery)."

African-Americans make up about 13 percent of young adults, so they are still somewhat over-represented in combat positions.

"In contrast, blacks account for 36 percent of Functional Support and Administration and 27 percent of Medical and Dental career fields. "

Interestingly, the military today seems to attract pugnacious whites and pragmatic blacks. Analysts have suggested that more young white men see the infantry as a way, in the words of one, to "play Rambo" from age 18 to 22, then go to college using military tuition benefits. In contrast, blacks often view the military as either a long-term career in itself, or as a way to get practical training for a civilian white-collar career.

Are soldiers the products of particularly poor families? In general, the enlisted ranks come from neither the top nor the bottom of society, but from working and middle class backgrounds. Very few enlistees appear to be the scions of the wealthy. (Some officers are from rich families, however; but a larger proportion of officers are the sons and daughters of officers.)

White enlistees tend to come from households somewhat lower in income than the general white population: $33,500 per year versus $44,400 for the average white, according to 1999 Defense Department statistics. Strikingly, black enlistees come from households above the black national average: $32,000 vs. $27,900.

In fact, on a number of measures, African-American enlistees tend to stand well above the black average and very close to, or above, the mean for white enlistees. The celebrated high degree of racial equality and amity found in the military, especially in the Army, would appear to benefit from the similar backgrounds that black and white soldiers bring to the Army.

Not only do black and white soldiers come from households of almost equal income, but their educational attainments are virtually identical. In 1994, 99 percent of black and 97 percent of white Army enlisted personnel were high school graduates, figures above the national average.

When the Volunteer Army began three decades ago, black recruits had much higher graduation rates that whites. In the late 1970s, according to Moskos and Sibley, 90 percent of black Army enlistees had their degrees, versus only about 40 percent of whites. After the large pay raises of the early 1980s, the Army was able to recruit a better-educated group of youth, so the black advantage narrowed as both groups' graduations rates approached 100 percent.

The racial gap in test scores that bedevils American civilian society is a much smaller problem in the Army.

Moskos and Sibley found that in 1994: "83 percent of white recruits scored in the upper half of the mental aptitude test (compared with 61 percent of white youths in the national population), while 59 percent of black recruits scored in the upper half (compared with 14 percent of the black youths nationwide)."

African-American enlistees are also more likely to come from two-parent families than is the norm among blacks, the Defense Department says.

Copyright © 2001-2003 United Press International
The men and women with who I served were among the best that the USofA has to offer. Charlie makes me think that they are indeed better than the idiots currently posing as leaders in Congress. For certain most of them got better grades in college than Kerry and Gore. This is particularly true of the National Guard where some rather successful men and women are junior enlisted (grade E-4 and below) because they've only recently enlisted. They didn't enlist for the money or education benefits either as they've already accomplished enough in life for that to be a non-issue.

So the next question is who is the racist? I think Charlie is the racist as it is Charlie who thinks that young black men and women must be STUPID and IGNORANT to enlist in the armed services. None that I know. Even the young men and women (of all ethnic and racial backgrounds) are smarter than average. They must be. They can't enlist unless they are!

Of course this is all connected to the cut-and-run crowd. The thing is that while we'd made our point in Vietnam and there wasn't likely to be any change in the world by leaving there, there will be terrible changes if we leave Iraq and/or Afghanistan.

Ok, so the war in Iraq has surpassed our time in WWII (but not that of the Revolution). Why does that matter anyway? Isn't each circumstance, each goal different?

Charlie doesn't get the reason for the war (or he does and he's a traitor) nor does he understand volunteerism. Makes me wonder why he became a Representative, not to serve his constituents but for himself I suppose. Anyway...
Charlie Rangel: Volunteer army composed of unemployed youngsters who don't want to fight
This is a partial transcript of Congressman Charlie Rangel's appearance on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace today.

Chris Wallace: [begins by citing Heritage Foundation's recently-published study showing US military is better educated and from higher-income neighborhoods than the average American] Congressman, in fact, contrary to what you've been saying, isn't the volunteer army better educated and well-to-do than the general population?

Rangel: Of course not. I want to make it abundantly clear that I have been advocating a draft ever since the President's been talking about war. [snip]I want to make it abundantly clear if anyone believes that these youngsters want to fight -- as the Pentagon and some generals have said -- you can just forget about it. No young, bright individual wants to fight just because of a bonus and just because of educational benefits. And most all of them come from communities of very very high unemployment. If a young fella has an option of having a decent career or joining the army to fight in Iraq, you can bet your life he would not be in Iraq. So anyone who supports the war, and is against everyone sharing in the sacrifice is just being hypocritical about the whole thing. The record is clear, and once we are able to get hearings on this, everyone will see what they already know, and that is that those who have the least opportunities at this age find themselves in the military , as I did when I was 18 years old.
You know, don't you, that there are folks who become doctors, nurses, teachers, EMTs, firemen, policemen, soldiers, priests/pastors, nuns, and so forth for no reason other than that they want to serve their fellow man, their fellow citizens. As I said, Charlie must only be in Congress to serve himself.
Thursday, November 16, 2006
  Political Action Request - CHP in National Parks
Urgent! We need to roll up our sleeves and hit this hard!

Senator George Allen, keeping his word to gun owners, has introduced S 4057, the National Park Second Amendment Restoration and Personal Protection Act of 2006, which will allow gun owners to carry in a National Park as long as the state where the National Park is located allows carry in parks!

Senator Allen needs to get the bill a Floor vote in the Senate and get it off to the House for passage that must happen before the end of the current session of Congress.

We need to do the following things ASAP to help Senator Allen MAKE THIS HAPPEN!:

1. Contact Senator John Warner and ask him to support S. 4057

Phone: 202-224-2023
Fax: 202-224-6295

Email web page:


2. Contact Senator Majority Leader, Bill Frist, and ask him to fast track S 4057!

Phone: 202-224-3344
Fax: 202-228-1264

Email web page:


3. Spread this email on other gun-related web sites and email lists so we can get the word out to gun owners across the nation! Send it to family, friends, and coworkers, especially those outside of Virginia. We need Senators from other states to support this bill and quickly!

Here is the web page that lists all Senators and their contact information for those not in Virginia:


They should contact both of their Senators and Bill Frist (item #2 above).


VA-ALERT is a project of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. (VCDL). VCDL is an all-volunteer, non-partisan grassroots organization dedicated to defending the human rights of all Virginians. The membership considers the Right to Keep and Bear Arms to be an essential human right.

VCDL web page: http://www.vcdl.org

I hope that everyone will contact their Senators AND Senator Frist AND publicize this.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
  Army Specialist Pleads Guilty to Rape/Murder of Iraqi
Army Specialist James P. Barker confessed to rape and killing of Iraqi girl and family members. If this is true, I'm hoping he wasn't intimidated into an untrue confession to save his life, I would prefer he and his partners hang. However, I doubt any of those guilty will get more than life in the castle (FT Leavenworth's military disciplinary barracks). Such acts are unconscionable, at least for US servicemen. Not so much for Muslims...
  Global Warming Buzz Continues
Boxer plans Senate hearings on global warming,
Climate change is as serious as WMD: Annan, Australia and US 'Bonnie and Clyde' of global warming: Gore, Crime Key to Final Year with few words from the other side such as Spokesman for U.S. senator says global warming skeptics are 'demonized' or Just wait for a more convenient truth, urges PM.

I am still of the opinion that the planet undergoes cyclic warming and cooling and that the events may differ, likely do differ in different parts of the world. Yes, it may be catastrophic for humans. I saw one report that we'll be reduced to 2 billions from the current 6+ billions. Still, there is nothing we can do about it. Politicians will only make it worse.
Sunday, November 12, 2006
  Borat Blech
Just saw what is possibly the worst movie I have ever seen. Borat. What a waste of money and time. It was PAINFUL to sit through this atrocity that masquerades as humor. The few people who laughed at some portions of the movie were audibly taken aback by others. My wife's verdict, "disgusting." For what its worth, she is the one who wanted to see it. My verdict, "don't waste your money."
Saturday, November 11, 2006
  Veterans Day 2006
A veteran, not of combat, myself I deeply appreciate every sacrifice that has been made by all those millions of US servicemen and women to defend our families and freedom. Thank you.
  "Gun" Rights and the "New" Congress
With the Democrats taking control of the Congress what do we have, as gun owners, in our future? First, I submit that gun rights are really human rights. Rights to self-defense, rights to political freedom, the right to defend freedom of speech, the right to defend being born of a particular race...

Anway, I don't think that much will happen due to gridlock. Sometimes gridlock is a good thing. The Dems are not united. They had to put up conservative candidates to beat the Republicans. No liberal won unless they ran unapposed like Pelosi, just look at Lamont who lost to Lieberman. Will these folks really be so beholding to Pelosi and Schumer that they will abandon their values to vote for these things? Maybe, but not with political pressure from home. I think they are smart enough to realize that they used the liberal leadership to give them an "in" in a party that is socialist but that when that older, often aging, leadership goes the new class will be the leadership. Also, these freshman senators and representatives realize that they will not be re-elected if they radically deviate from their campaign persona. The margin is much better than it seems as the RINOs are gone (e.g. Chafee and Dewine) and there are not 60 votes they thought they needed. I think the two houses are still divided, even among the Dems as the Reps have such a short time to their election cycle.

The Dems will also be distracted, continue to be distracted, by their hatred of Bush and his cabinet. They are already working towards trial or hearings on all those poor souls who served the past 6 years. The first lamb up for slaughter will be Rumsfeld.

The Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has served the country most of his 72 years and done a darn fine job the whole time. He was brought in to restructure the Army and was confronted with going on a war footing at the same time after 9/11. His replacement Gates may be different in temperment but not in accomplishment nor in ability and that will not make much difference for the management of the war. After all, it is the circumstances surrounding the war that will effectively make the decisions for the leaders, not the Secretary of Defense. Still, it will distract the Dems. Distracted, we will not be so easy a target.

What concerns me more is that our perceived weaknesses will encourage our enemies to take a greater risk and again attack us here in the homeland. That will be disastrous for the Dems but it can be more disastrous for shooters in that components will become hard to get either due to simple non-availability or to increased cost as a result of rising fuel prices and competition with military requirements. If it is a major attack, it could seriously damage our economy or even require the restructuring of our transportation system. In that case you'd best be prepared to get along with what you have. That includes .22 LR ammo. At least your "excess" can be traded.
Friday, November 10, 2006
  Reid and Pelosi Making Nice with the POTUS
Now, if you want to see a liar you can look at these two pledge to work with the President for the little guy or the middle class. They don't know what the middle class is. They think that my wife (a teacher) and I (retired soldier) are rich. That is so much horse hockey.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
  Election Results
Many, including myself, are saddened by the choices the US electorate has made. Reasoned response has been replaced by emotional reaction. Some of the finest this nation had to offer were defeated by a combination of deceit (the liberal national Democrat leadership offering "conservative" Dems in opposition to conservative Republicans) and the anger of a conservative base deserted by to many who put party ahead of their constituents.

I want to know why they didn't accomplish the following:
- permanent elimination of the "death"/inheritance tax?
- permanent reduction of tax cuts or income tax reform?
- secure borders and the removal of illegal aliens?
- national concealed carry reciprocity?
- concealed carry in National Parks?

Still, I voted for my Senator and Representative as they at least worked towards those goals. I am hoping that there will be gridlock such that Bush can pursue his foreign policy. That is critical. Nothing else matters if we are destroyed or isolated by the islamofacists.
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
  Kerry Does it Again
Kerry Belittles U.S. Troops

Can one believe this guy? Soldiers aren't drafted, they are educated with a large percentage having some college, many, many with at least an associate degree. Many senior NCOs (E-6 and above) have Bachelor and even Master's degrees, many of these NCOs actually having more education than the junior officers that lead them. The disparity is even greater in the reserves where many enlisted are college students.

But that's not the whole story. Unlike during periods where the draft has been in effect only the best can enlist. Did you know that 72% of the US youth population can't meet enlistment standards? Did you know that 100% of the US Armed Forces are volunteers?

John Kerry should keep his arrogant opinions to himself, it would certainly be a benefit to his party.
  Media Causes Crime?
Please take the time to read Chris Allen's article on the subject.
For us, the American ideal is personified in the concept of self-reliance, work ethic, honesty/forthrightness, decency, personal property rights, family, religion, an ability to defend oneself from criminals and crooked politicians, and personal responsibility.

Whoop-ti-do, the forum for the rest of us...

May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / February 2010 / March 2010 /

Email The Editor

Locations of visitors to this page

Site Meter

View My Stats
Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]